Associate Freud and Don Juan, "that seems to say the least adventurous, if not foolhardy. And, worse yet, pay the heirs to Don Juan, "what provocation that contained essentially the man who, rejecting his ancestry, have no offspring, the libertine who his quest for enjoyment bar all access to meet others and temporality, "as the author said at the opening. Indeed, it must be followed carefully in this demonstration uncompromising and unrelenting that leads us on paths that, frankly, are not borrowed, and never, to my knowledge, with such precision and such talent.
Miren Arambourou-Mélèse offers us a fascinating book which, with remarkable thoroughness of thought, demolishes a number of platitudes repeated ad nauseam in the companies analysts since Freud.
What is particularly innovative and inspiring and suggesting - which is "the greatest compliment one can give a book - is that it does not fit into pro-or in anti-Freudian conception of women, as we have seen and read so much in recent years, both the reading of Freud's position is often an excuse to throw the baby with the bathwater. His questioning is much more acute and disturbing. His perfect knowledge of German led him to rediscover the texts of a sometimes abrasive manner, which allows you to review many "misunderstandings". So is it for example the term "Urheberin" Freud uses this word to mean "one who assumes responsibility for the act of making the world", the "original author", "the first one that provides care necessary for its survival beyond the neotonic. It is the mother of the first exchanges, according to Winnicott, the mother's concern primary, which translates into humanized instinctual movements of his little violently. As highlighted Miren Arambourou-Mélèse, "this melee that seems to terrify so many people is the first time that humanizes the small mammal born a man and a woman." Thus the author shows us that she Freud, "the conqueror of the most flood of female sexuality", will be led to think not in terms of transmission identification with the father, "eliminating this drastically another of sexual procreation, including the form of "mother love" that Yet considered as devoid of ambivalence.
It shows, from Freud the man and what transpires in his letters - that place where one indulges in his most intimate movements - how his theory follows logically impeccable so what ' He was a man of his time who wrote to his fiancee Martha: "We must agree that keeping a home and the care and upbringing of children requires a whole person and exclude any gain money. [...] Mill has simply forgotten, as everything concerning the sexual, that humans are divided between men and women and that this difference is most important that exists between them. [...] If I had to see my dear beloved a competitor, I would put everything at stake for him to abandon the competition in favor of the quiet and unassuming business from my house. [...] The law and custom have given women many rights they still refused, but the situation of women can never be other than what it is, a beloved adored in his youth, a wife revered in his maturity. "
These words from a young man impatient and frustrated by a long wait and a long chastity, how they will make sense later when the long-awaited meeting will result in direct birth of a numerous progeny, these "worms" to be fed, which requires him to work exhausting and causes the material concerns which distract any time he wants to pursue his research.
It is essential to maintain order, which "guarantees the dominance of adult males to the female fertile wombs, and at the price (heavy for generations) the establishment of a construction sollipsiste and such as a locking thought could not be any different place.Ceux who tried to escape have paid dearly.
For as the author said at the time of Freud, "kept women away from achieving social and cultural, patriarchal society imposes the discharge of instinctual energy, the submission to the prohibitions of moral enacted by the masters of the logos. " Freud was not without knowing it when he said that what could best treat the hysterical, it was a personal success.
Times have changed, but that still does this Originally, "what remains we have not developed inherited from our fathers, and they ravage areas of work exchange and transmission of psychoanalysis that we are given?
should be resumed step by step the progress of this demonstration in this book extremely dense and documented. The authors undertook a first reading of the myth of Don Juan, from The abuser of Seville and The Stone Guest by Tirso de Molina's Don Giovanni by Mozart and Da Ponte and, finally, the Dom Juan by Molière .
We know that Freud was not so interested in Don Juan, although at the time supported the work of Rank on "Don Juan and his double." This part of the book-Miren Arambourou Mélèse could have been a book by itself. The author attempts to show that reveals itself in this myth, the "abyssal fault on which the patriarchal system is built." Exclude the mother of the "symbolic system of affiliation" leaves two competing powers that are brought inevitably clash. Only the murder of the father or sterilizing the submission will be an alternative for the son. Miren Arambourou Mélèse-in show for the deadly impact of Freud's spiritual son.
In the second part of the book, Miren Arambourou-breeds, from reading the correspondence of Freud analyzes his way between Breuer and Charcot, and his passionate relationship with Fliess, and after the huge disappointment of the rupture, the establishment of a theoretical system defensive avoided further questioning on the iniquity of the fathers. Incidentally, she dusts off brilliantly with the myth of Oedipus. Thus, she says, "to close the Pandora's box he opened, Freud made statue of the commander, shuttering its part of Don Juan de la science."
The third part opens way for a range of clinical consequences should be able to work point by point. She made a large part to advances in Winnicott, but also leaves itself guess (which is rare) in its own position and the transitional space that is capable of allowing the patient to live.
This book is a mine of essential questions that should get to work for long. By Laura
Dethiville
0 comments:
Post a Comment