I hear on the radio that is termed the revolt revolution Tunisian jasmine. This expression is revealed as hollow misguided (jasmine evokes the proof of love). If you want to remain at a level of symbolism, jasmine, which is the emblem Tunisian designate also (especially?) the temptation (female at that). I do not know exactly if it is this meaning that hearing inspire designers this color revolution, but it indicates that not only the Tunisian political reversal is not a revolution (it is devoid of any alternative political project) but also that this revolution is handled by the same developers as those promulgated in the recent past the color revolutions.
The financier Soros sponsoring charitable foundations (like the Open Society Fund and Human Rights Watch) that advocate for the democratic right of interference, the right to make hypocritical democracy to a dictatorial regime considered. On behalf of the strategy that goes back to the Dutch lawyer Grotius on behalf of the Dutch East India Company (since associated closely with the British East India Company had promoted liberalism of Smith and others), the financial operating from the City of London (and its extension on Wall Street U.S.) fund maneuvers of political destabilization in the name of virtuous purposes. May disappoint the enthusiasts who think that the Tunisian people won freedom from the tyrant that Ben Ali has fled his country, just look at the course in exile said potentate to understand that his fall between the implementation of the strategy of global chaos type - with special subordination of French neo-colonial interests in the cut (set) British interests.
Ben Ali fled it seems to Cyprus, then won protection under Saudi Dubai before joining the kingdom Arabia. Suffice to say that it is under the explicit protection of the British Empire and those that reduce the British Empire in the United States carry an over-simplification which will be judged harshly for a historical perspective. The undeniable political and diplomatic influence of the United States in this case can not be seen properly that in light of the subordination of U.S. government financial interests of Wall Street - and the financial interests of Wall Street to those of the City of London.
The fact that the propaganda of Western media call this revolution a name evoking the temptation proves an infamous cynicism: it is worse to create insoluble conflicts and divisions that support a dictatorial power. No question of supporting a bloody despot of the caliber of Ben Ali - or French imperialism against British imperialism, this generation of Arab tyrants grotesque born of decolonization jumps at each Once she opposes the strategy of the British Empire: Hussein was hanged after having served the British and American interests in the war against Iran (already a clear case of endless bloody division).
The merits of the case lies in understanding the mechanisms of the strategy of chaos we create chaos instead of the continuity of the peace of Westphalia. French imperialist strategy was part of this line wetsphalienne certainly so hypocritical oligarchy, so that the strategy of the British Empire in collapse is to create chaos everywhere outside the West (United States and European Union). This strategy was consigned by the theorist Cooper, currently close to Baroness Ashton.
This strategic design considers that there are nation-states that have advanced the level of integration order postwestphalien federations imperialist - and states that are dominated and for which the rules of law and order Democratic Liberal not apply. It is this conception which is currently applied in Tunisia and elsewhere. The most pernicious is to think the so-Disnat Tunisian jasmine revolution in isolation, disconnected from all the chaotic uprisings occurring around the world.
We forget that one of the causes of the revolt of Tunisia was the dramatic rise in food products. This issue is felt more strongly in the markets of poor countries or emerging markets, but it affects the whole world. The multiple uprisings disorders or partitions of countries which currently exist in various parts of Africa join the same process as the episode Tunisia. In all cases, the goal is not to impose a new order in place of the old order (the new order that is higher or lower), but to sow chaos and discord.
is the strict policy applied with a cynicism and perversity in Afghanistan or Iraq. This same policy was applied in Congo - Kinshasa and in all countries which are under British administration (when talking about American imperialism, it means so reductive that British imperialism true and verifiable). The political chaos benefits the imperialist factions that have a free hand to perpetrate their appetite for predation. Destroy the institutions and states the name change and replace them with endless conflicts, modeled on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict (initiated by disagreements of the Sykes-Picot). If
can hope that Tunisia (and people) know political progress marked by democracy and especially the Republic, it is greatly to be feared that the departure of the tyrant Ben Ali means least the end of the dictatorship that the beginning of the political chaos . We play on the popular enthusiasm for finally galvanized toppled dictatorial and corrupt Ben Ali to impose a new regime, perhaps less dictatorial in appearance, but just as corrupt in the background. The Ben Ali regime suggests that imperialism is collapsing in the Maghreb region as elsewhere in Africa, while it is only the transfer of power between the interests French and British interests. Las
! The truth is more sinister: the French-African interests are submerged in the cup even more imperialist British imperialism in disarray. Hence the clashes and massacres that express the adjustment of imperialism to its plight. Divide and conquer is the motto of imperialism (one measures the literal application of the program with geographic and ethnic dismemberment of the country). More imperialism collapses, the more it increases this trend. A recent article by French journalist Quatremer
http://bruxelles.blogs.liberation.fr/coulisses/2011/01/the-european-foreign-office.html
denounced (with reason) the British Foreign Office's stranglehold on European diplomacy. Quatremer fails fair to ask the fundamental question induced by all of his reasoning: how to explain that this hegemony work?
Masochism French (or German) does not explain everything. The psychological explanation for the fascination is insufficient. Other European diplomats refuse to submit that because British diplomacy is invested with a higher power. In today's world, the higher power is held by financial whose center is located in the City of London.
Quatremer tells us that in the flowchart of European diplomacy, the Maghreb region escapes now to French diplomacy and passes under the umbrella of hegemonic British diplomacy. What better symbol to explain what is happening today in some regions French: passage of French imperialism subject to British imperialism as dominant as moribund, application of theories about the Cooper postimpéralisme controlled from the European Federation (relay via its U.S. and not vice versa) and submitting to his implacable law required states to colonial and backward - Case of Tunisia among others?
0 comments:
Post a Comment