What has been happening for Libya after a (small) half century of military dictatorship plutocratic ignites suddenly and that this good Colonel K. (K. pretty worrying still, as Kissinger or Kouchner) displays the farce of the world that is not just a deranged sex? We never talk about the terrible food crisis born out of speculation in commodities. It is this food crisis is the root cause and verifiable riots around the world, anger that are not confined only to Arab and Muslim countries.
When it is realized that Libya is strongly influenced in its political role of tribes by the atavistic, when you add that AQIM, nebulous sort of unexpected and sudden regional al Qaeda has split from a statement of support for the rebels Libyan
http://www.lemonde.fr/afrique/article/2011/02/24/libye-al-qaida-au-maghreb-apporte-son-soutien-total-aux -manifestants_1484428_3212.html
we realize that in a context of widespread and global meltdown, some financial forces play the card of destabilization and chaos at all costs to maintain their power. Either they emerge, or they promote chaos.
It is likely that the voice of the ventriloquist AQIM indicates that financiers who run the British Empire decided to launch the chaos in their dominions revolts and uprisings to succeed. No snapshots and photographs; just a process. It distorts the dynamics of the process by cutting it in isolated moments and made stationary. Based on the information succulent that the deceased potentate Mubarak had placed huge amounts of money in financial institutions in London and Swiss capital, that now that the track Gaddafi leads in turn to pillars of the British Empire.
http://www.rue89.com/2011/02/23/un-don-du-fils-kadhafi-gene-la-london-school-of-economics-192001
http:// www.lefigaro.fr/flash-eco/2011/02/22/97002-20110222FILWWW00522-la-lse-coupe-les-liens-avec-la-libye.php
We know that Colonel often brags to be the enemy of the West, a little less since he has recently resumed diplomatic thread with the worst Western bodies, including the IMF (especially since 2003). Near Italian oil interests, to the point it seems to inspire erotic-sexual delusions of ultramafieux Berlusconi, Gaddafi is more from the heart of the British Empire. His son tipped to be his successor, Seif al-Islam sympathetic, had offered a donation in January 2010 at the London School of Economics, one of the factories in socio-economic experts the most prestigious of the British Empire. Gift that is now denied, since the smell of Colonel became embarrassing to say the least with his decision to fire by all means protest over his people.
When do we note finally that the British Empire as much in need of mercenaries supposedly loyal cronies protest that? It was much needed around the City of London in ultraliberalism pundits tend Friedmann as bearded Islamists and other tyrants of all stripes. Gaddafi into this latter category lackluster. It is an antique railing against falling into the category of typical opponents under the thumb of the British Empire. All those who claim to oppose the United States by proposing nothing alternative (seriously, eh) are servants more or less conscious and more or less real crazies of the Empire of factional agenda, with special to attack the United Nations.
Without going so far that Ahmadinejad would dare illuminated (although) it is obvious that Osama was less volatile than manipulated and that Gaddafi has severe behavioral problems (another paranoid and a psychopath in power). The link between the son-heir (putative) Colonel and the LSE value of confession, as is the case with Mubarak places financial investment: another servant of the Empire collapses.
Especially not a genuine opponent. It can be a constructive rebel and pull his people. Evidence that Gaddafi is a tyrant and that rule by the most violent brutality. How operates the Empire? He needs support as much as opponents. Whether one finds the large Western presence in Libya, particularly around the oil (Libya possesses the largest proven oil reserves in Africa). The first evidence that the regime of Colonel pact with imperialist interests it claims to fight. Pan-Arabism
Gaddafi is a joke that calls for little comment other than the scam of false opposition lacks alternative. Another obvious sign is that when the international financial system disintegrates, the plan supposedly revolutionary (and is tyrannical) collapses Gaddafi in Libya. Sign that he was supported by various elements of the British financial and industrial empire and was an opponent hairpiece, as Osama is a fake terrorist leader who made the game almost explicit British interests, through various relays, including the now unmasked Saudis (and their demented Wahhabism and simplistic).
A real question, instead of taking for granted and unquestionable uprisings in Libya, would be to examine the origin of massive military aid that can not fail to be made to the insurgents. Why the armed revolt she can afford to develop? How is it that these revolts have begun near the region richest in oil (around Benghazi)? Does not it connects not Gaddafi at its recent policy of structural adjustment and deregulation ultraliberal as practiced since 2003? Colonel psychotic rhetoric against terrorist attacks orchestrated by Osama and al Qaeda speaks volumes about the identity of destabilizing the Libyan regime.
We could also mention other disturbing facts, such as links between certain groups of revolt against Gaddafi and Western intelligence agencies (CIA, for example) - or is older than Gaddafi that never ceased to denounce Israel and Zionism, was repeatedly protected by the Mossad and the Israeli leadership, which says a lot about its compromise can be blind and skewed, but most, with the Western enemy that He claims to be fighting. Yes, Qaddafi is a pawn of British imperialism and its controllers let him go like all their regional satraps, to better introduce instead of the potentate hardliner policy horrible and abominable chaos.
addition it is explicit that the alternative to pan-Arab al-Gaddafi is based on the bloody farce (as was the case with Saddam), the ferment of revolt is not confined the East fantasy. We are witnessing right now demonstrations pronounced in India,
http://www.radio-canada.ca/nouvelles/International/2011/02/23/007-inde-manifestation-inflation_chomage.shtml
in Greece
http://www.lemonde.fr/europe/article/2011/02/23/violences-lors-de-la-premiere-greve-generale-de-l-annee-en-grece_1484348_3214.html
and even a failed state in the United States:
http://www.solidariteetprogres.org/article7449.html
People do not rise up suddenly and without explanation against dictators Profile quite similar, installed, protected or recognized by the West, corrupt and violent. The riots following the hyperinflation of commodities that hit the poorest in full force and without any controls.
I recently mentioned the hunger that threatens the poor more and more of Madagascar. The general economic situation is catastrophic and connecting with the political chaos that ensues (and is this a revolting cynicism as structured and popular revolutions in the media of the West). As chaos hits the margins of the Empire, the damage remains high, though terrible, from the moment the heart of the empire is hit, the collapse accelerates and the dynamics of the disintegration process takes a more radical, as is the case in a fire.
We are in a particularly severe where the heart of the Empire begins to be affected specifically. If we fail to respond in depth, by dismantling the financial cartels around the City of London and using as a starting point and reference tool for analyzing the work of the U.S. Commission Angelides, we could switch into an abyss we do not emerge until a good night's darkness. Of course, once Again, if we stick to a distorted interpretations we amalgamons Empire UK financial fantasies with the American Empire and U.S. financial interests in the effective cutting of the British Empire, we can not understand the situation or take appropriate action to address them.
We can relate the fall of the Gaddafi regime with that of its protectors of the financial system. We continue to miss the point: if the Western leaders failed to anticipate these revolts impressive, which are still in their premises, because after having been complacent controllers these corrupt regimes, they are unable to take the measure of the current collapse, which reflects the disappearance of the liberal system they serve and they are defending - the image of Sarkozy in France. When do we understand the economic and financial crisis we suffer is irreparable and the only way out is to leave the bankrupt liberalism by putting private interests that compose?
PS: I would like to end by noting that the fall of Mubarak and Gaddafi ring as a sign of the inevitable overthrow of Israel in the region. In any case, Israel, supported, after was created by the pillars of the British Empire, can not survive the collapse of that empire programmed. This is great news for the Palestinians martyred and for those that do not support the expression of neo-colonialism almost abrupt expression of the fittest. Just hope that the disappearance of Israel in its current form will not end by vengeful massacre, but by building a peaceful nation-state, secular model inspired by the Lebanese society passed.
0 comments:
Post a Comment