http://www.marianne2.fr/Incroyable-mais-vrai% C2% A0-25-of-employees-win-less-of-750-_a202405.html
With this new incredible for most of those who do not already see the effects of the economic and cultural crisis, you have proof of oligachisation rampant, although more and more visible and noticeable, liberal society. Not only 25% of workers earn less than 750 euros per month, but more worrying is the growing insecurity of work in the West (ie France). The living standard of the French has deteriorated incredibly in ten years. The casualness of the depoliticization oligarchisation encourages this undemocratic and anti-republican.
Not to see what awaits France if it continues on this path, it is argued that the decline in living standards would not be so obvious and well look at it, all is not so bad. The precariousness of work is the formal proof that these observers are wrong and urgently needs to become politically active to ward off the danger and oligarchic power post look in a mirror (not repeat the attitudes prevalent during the Second World War the Collaboration of fear, cowardice and weakness).
The oligarchisation which creates mass unemployment coupled with job insecurity and social program was founded by British Prime Minister:
http://www.20minutes.fr/ledirect/660796 / economics-david-cameron-boasts-new-europe-deregulation
When one remembers that Cameron is the right of its predecessor Thatcher, we measure that ultra-liberalism promotes the more radical: the inegalitarianism visceral, as he found himself theorized by the circles around Hayek - the Mont Pelerin Society. No wonder the current political representative of the British Empire on the floor of the British nation-state and hacked vampirized take this kind of speech that serves as collateral theoretical model of society that generates employment situation in France and worldwide. Cameron adjusts to the economic disintegration of his country from the rest of te world, except that the self and encourages instead.
In this fool's game, the visceral inegalitarianism benefits shameless speculators who can clearly what to invent to find bonus to their casual and amoral wickedness:
http://www.liberation.fr/economie/0101564779-golden-hello-chez-dexia
Contrary to what , argue proponents of ultra-liberalism, it is false or misleading to estimate a single policy is possible and necessary - that of ultra-liberalism to power in the West around the neoconservatives and libertarians regimes. The example shows that Iceland is symbolized two choices on one side by the Irish example and the other in Iceland. The Irish are currently subject to the dictates monetarists of the City of London interbank conglomerate around the Inter-Alpha, when Iceland has nationalized the banking sector in bankruptcy and made the people of Iceland republican and democratic accountability of the credit money:
http:/ / www.metrofrance.com/info/l-islande-at-elle-fait-sa-revolution/mkaB!tWI2q1w6pfehA/
To those who would argue that encouraging example of Iceland, on the contrary the collapse of Ireland, is not representative of other peoples - as if Iceland is too isolated, or confined, it should be noted that the recent report of the Angelides U.S. Commission of Inquiry on the financial crisis, chaired by an elected Democrat namesake, after pointing the finger at Obama's active complicity in respect of Wall Street and the banking industry, denounced the repeal of the Glass-Steagall (without explicitly propose its restoration as a solution to prevent the financial crisis is worsening globally, as I said a little quickly, but the denunciation of the repeal of the Glass-Steagall is the de facto demand his reinstatement) . You know, the law enacted by Roosevelt to avert the devastating effects of the Depression and was abolished Clinton by a clear political orders of Wall Street (including the effective participation of the hilarious Summers).
Angelides condemns not only finance its crazy and deranged servants and zealous politicians (like Obama's ultra-liberal Democrat). He recalled that the argument that there is only one path, that the massive bailout of banks and suicidal, is a stinking sophistry: "If we accept the refrain that" nobody could predict what would happen "and that" nothing could be done "" , then, is obliged "will happen" again. As proof, the Glass-Steagll Act which is the historical precedent defended primarily by LaRouche since the end of Bretton Woods.
The Glass-Steagall which will separate the commercial banks drastically investment banks could, applied globally and not just in Western format, to bankrupt the banks under state guarantees infusion and return to sound economic criteria of physical output ensuring financial speculation controlled and regulated. For those who doubt the viability of the Glass-Steagall, frightened by the bad reputation of LaRouche, the example of single parent Nobel laureate Maurice Allais French economy should tell them that this pathway expresses prosperity Republican (and first in the classical sense).
Allais also is in favor of a system close to the Glass-Steagall and have been the only French economist and one of the few globally to have predicted the crisis two decades, to the point that 'He was marginalized by the mainstream media French, incidentally, Allais has publicly supported the proposals of economic and LaRouche his associates before he died recently (a sign that LaRouche is not at all sectarian extremists, but misunderstood by disturbing ideas apply). These two examples lucid (finally economists who predicted the current crisis rationally devastating and widespread and have proposed remedies precise and concordant) were taken late and without any appointment, at the times (institutional U.S.) by the ratio Angelides which has the main merit in mind that the political oligarchy is more avoidable than the current crisis was predictable. If the French want to return to full employment, they must adopt urgent measures like Glass-Steagall connected to a Bretton Woods global (a Glass-Steagall circumscribed in French would be an inappropriate and laughable, like the so-called socialist commitments and strong naive taken by the Government under the Mitterrand era Mauroy ente 1981 and 1982).
0 comments:
Post a Comment