Until a certain condition, a given, is able to provide some liberal or even a certain extravagance, its members, it does not deprive them. Never given a reason for not having fun or frivolous free to destroy. As a rule makes progress, the design is in favor of oligarchy (the oligarchic progress being limited). Only with the collapse predictable given the (state) that dominance is no longer able to ensure progress through his limited environment and it derives more and more violently and openly towards tyranny - the strictest version of the oligarchy.
We lived in a system that was still able to provide its finite center and nerve (the West) this idea of progress and sharing. Then we are in the transition period where we can switch to hard oligarchic regimes, reflecting the collapse of the liberal system (with derivative in ultra-liberalism). Collapse predictable: the finite ends up being destroyed. The change leaves us facing two major options, the option is not stagnation, either increase or decrease. In both cases, change - move or disappear.
Not knowingly, voluntarily and harmful, as structures of oligarchy hard (tyranny) are set up: it is to stave off the inevitable collapse of any given part of any state that in the finite, static, according to the law of entropy. These times become violent and clashed historical moments in which conspiracies abound, manipulation and collective follies (beyond individual dementias). Without doubt this is the need to respond either to grow, given that pushes some to deny its collapse (decay) and invent a new point, a given anti-entropic (not a disinterested stimulation).
We are in such a period of change, except that the change in question is an adult. The man spends more or less of transcendentalism to something else, a new era - what I called the néanthéisme . Politically, this period of emptiness is based on the resurgence religious and ontological nihilism of modern immanence. Much is said about the obsolescence of nation-states and their replacement by a liberal internationalist ideology. It's a hidden way of legitimizing the replacement of the protection guaranteed by the States by the law of the strongest, the famous fight of all against all, touted as the premises of the British Empire by the political philosopher and supporter of the hopeless oligarchy Hobbes.
We, citizens of liberal democracies convicted and imminent peril, think (evil) that we can find solutions (which?) That can save the current state and to defer to Derrida, or even prevent the change of Platonic type (certainly not Hegelian). Major mistake: change is necessary. Either we change and we base a new larger state (anti-entropic), or we sink into chaos and destruction (the end of entropy and decay). We have no other choice. This mode of operation associated with the representation of reality to a standard finite, which is called into question the concept of real finish is not only false, it is retrograde in the sense that it prevents the perpetuation of man.
theory entropy is a physical theory. The current mode masked of positivism and scientism spouses (under various avatars and sophisticated) can move from a physical theory of entropy in its recovery trend of philosophical metaphysics (in an Aristotelian sense). That we can pass a sham philosophical innovation is characteristic of philosophical blindness nihilistic in which we move, especially since the era immanent. The real is not entropic. Nor that the Earth is flat or that space and time are a priori elements .
The philosophical interpretation of entropy leads to the glorification of chaos and adaptation social and economic rights in the decay contradictory and ridiculous. But this reduction in real economics, then, as a trickle in the green, indicates that we place barriers between people and their effective development, so much so that it comes to insidiously legitimize the necessity and uniqueness of measures that are necessary and unique perspective in the destructive nihilism. 2011: is this deformation that man is, but this is not voluntary.
The oligarchy is never voluntary. It is, as it shows itself, necessary. The program degenerated into oligarchic tyranny and destruction because it includes in its operation within a cardinal error. Not because he would deliberately aware of this error and it intends to promote tyranny. Because the option tyrannical as qu'oligarchie explicit and virulent is the necessary extension of the error contained in the premises of the real finite. Theory entropy is the bond that encourages philosophical nihilist error. When it comes to keeping the physical to the philosophical nihilist is perpetrating the crime based on confusion between theoretical physics and philosophy.
Socrates according to Plato taught already: the error is not voluntary. The choice of necessity oligarchical is therefore never a choice. This is why the expression of voluntary servitude, used by La Boetie, is an expression that has achieved historic success and intellectual all the more important it is based on the error: no easement can be voluntary - no more as scheduled. The success comes from the fact that the expression is based on a concept immanent in which any action can only result from the desire (or his parent's will).
should probably better to speak of servitude required to indicate the need and means connotes the narrowing of the real to the finish. The easement will come from the error of estimating the option of tyranny and slavery is unique. This is not the will, but it must designate the mimicry, it being understood that the will in this case means an imperfect human faculty and blinded that under no circumstances take place in the ultimate ontological explanation. The desire of man as the end establishes the reduction of man.
When any program that integrates oligarchy based on vice, that the immanent theory is wrong, the expression of voluntary servitude remains a paradox that remains superficial and precisely in the spirit of contradiction - the oxymoron. The easement can only unintentionally. The will that is reduced at the end of life is more than the will. It is a faculty hypertrophied. Servitude is involuntary in the sense that the will is subordinate.
subordinated to reason, which itself splits into two intellectual and practical reason over and the creative reason, which creates from the moment it contacts the infinite. The easement would be incompatible with creation. Creative reason a way out of bondage. The order leads inevitably and necessarily oligarchic servitude. He does not express, but it contains a flaw. To express, he would propose a coherent approach. When we have an inconsistent approach, we do not realize it.
Violence destroys lucidity. Over trial in healthy mentality oligarchic and mimetic. That tells us the structure of reality: reality is incomplete and open to the sense that any attempt to destroy it leads to destruction and the possible introduction of force of mimicry. It is never freedom by which one chooses the need and destruction. It is through deception.
0 comments:
Post a Comment